Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific is 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 10.3% on the previous year and down 24.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
That places East Asia & Pacific 38th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0221 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0234 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0209 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0131 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0098 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0074 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | +1400.0% |
| 1973 | 0.1968 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1974 | 0.3537 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.8% |
| 1975 | 0.8711 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.2% |
| 1976 | 0.3193 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 1977 | 0.3345 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1978 | 0.6739 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.5% |
| 1979 | 0.8235 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1980 | 0.7649 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1981 | 0.6333 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1982 | 0.7784 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1983 | 0.8354 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1984 | 0.8137 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1985 | 0.4837 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 1986 | 0.6457 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1987 | 0.8277 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1988 | 0.8174 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 0.6018 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 1990 | 0.6108 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.2% |
| 1992 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 1993 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.8% |
| 1994 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.8% |
| 1995 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1996 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1997 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1998 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1999 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2000 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2002 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2003 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2004 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 2005 | 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.5% |
| 2006 | 4.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2007 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.9% |
| 2008 | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2009 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 2010 | 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2011 | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2012 | 5 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2013 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2014 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2015 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.6% |
| 2016 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2017 | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2018 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 2019 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2020 | 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2021 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 2022 | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 2023 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0175 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0074 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0258 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3663 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8711 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.7202 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4837 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8354 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6108 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 35 Burundi 33.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Nigeria 30.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Grenada 29.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Cambodia 26.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Sudan 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Gambia 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.