East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 109.43 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 23.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Hong Kong, China ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong, China in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 85.5 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 370.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 366.27 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 5.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 191.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 185.89 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 8.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -11,162 current US$ per square kilometre | 11,170 current US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China?
- 109.43 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1996.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th and Hong Kong, China ranks 41st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.