Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.86 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 52.1%
Rank
39th
of 45 groups
All-time high
34.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0.8786 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) recorded 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
The figure is down 52.1% on the previous year and down 72.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.8786 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1963 | 0.8786 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 1964 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 1965 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1966 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.6% |
| 1967 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 1968 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1969 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1970 | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.8% |
| 1971 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1972 | 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1973 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1974 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1975 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1976 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1977 | 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1978 | 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1979 | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1980 | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 1981 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 1982 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1983 | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1984 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 1985 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 1986 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.1% |
| 1987 | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1988 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.3% |
| 1989 | 7.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1990 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1991 | 5.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1992 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1993 | 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.8% |
| 1994 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1995 | 8.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1996 | 9.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1997 | 9.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 9.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1999 | 9.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2001 | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2002 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2003 | 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2004 | 12.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.5% |
| 2005 | 14.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2006 | 18.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2007 | 22.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2008 | 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
| 2009 | 24.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 2010 | 17.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2011 | 10.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2012 | 13.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2013 | 17.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2014 | 15.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2015 | 21.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2016 | 17.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2017 | 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2018 | 20.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2019 | 23.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2020 | 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2021 | 18.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2022 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 2023 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8786 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 16.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 36 North Macedonia 183.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Uganda 157.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Sri Lanka 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Comoros 124.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Hong Kong, China 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Pakistan 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 34.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.8786 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 39th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 72.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.