High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

High income
0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
93.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
45th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • High income
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 93.7 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was High income ahead.

High income ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1 current US$ per square kilometre 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre 6.77 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.9262 current US$ per square kilometre 68.74 current US$ per square kilometre 67.81 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.8976 current US$ per square kilometre 100.23 current US$ per square kilometre 99.33 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0632 current US$ per square kilometre 151 current US$ per square kilometre 150.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1617 current US$ per square kilometre 354.69 current US$ per square kilometre 354.52 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0545 current US$ per square kilometre 179.93 current US$ per square kilometre 179.87 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), High income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between High income and Zimbabwe?
93.7 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do High income and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
High income ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/zimbabwe/">High income vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.