Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in High income stood at 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 81.4% on the previous year and down 95.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in High income peaked at 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, -3.17 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places High income 44th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.9349 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1963 | 0.9716 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1964 | 0.9824 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1965 | 0.8891 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1966 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1967 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 1968 | 0.765 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 1969 | 0.999 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1970 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.3% |
| 1971 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1972 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1973 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1974 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1975 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1976 | 0.9893 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1977 | 0.981 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1978 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1979 | 0.9483 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1980 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1981 | 0.8097 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1982 | 0.8327 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 0.5973 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1984 | 0.5765 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1985 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.2% |
| 1986 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1987 | 0.9817 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1988 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1989 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1990 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1991 | 0.7844 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1992 | -0.8094 current US$ per square kilometre | -203.2% |
| 1993 | 0.6758 current US$ per square kilometre | -183.5% |
| 1994 | 0.8415 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1995 | 0.5572 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 1996 | 0.6011 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1997 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +433.7% |
| 1998 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.0% |
| 1999 | 0.7284 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.0% |
| 2000 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.3% |
| 2001 | 0.5631 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.5% |
| 2002 | 0.4596 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2003 | 0.6312 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2004 | 0.1853 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 2005 | 0.4883 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.6% |
| 2006 | -0.0666 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.6% |
| 2007 | -3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +4664.7% |
| 2008 | 0.1609 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.1% |
| 2009 | 0.1709 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1064 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 2011 | 0.035 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 2012 | 0.188 current US$ per square kilometre | +436.8% |
| 2013 | 0.1099 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.6% |
| 2014 | 0.2345 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.4% |
| 2015 | 0.3441 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.7% |
| 2016 | 0.256 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.6% |
| 2017 | 0.1465 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0704 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 2019 | 0.1262 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0979 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0857 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2022 | 0.0289 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9949 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.765 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9483 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9262 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5765 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8976 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8094 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0632 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1617 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.035 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3441 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0545 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0979 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 41 Hong Kong 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Pakistan 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 South Sudan 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Kenya 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Zimbabwe 93.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Tonga 90.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 Georgia 90.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in High income was 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- High income ranks 44th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 95.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.