Bangladesh vs Lower middle income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Bangladesh
161.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income
12.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
15th
Lower middle income rank
18th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Lower middle income
0200400600197920012023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.73 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 148.5 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 12.7 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 15th and Lower middle income ranks 18th of 121 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 84.44 current US$ per square kilometre 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre 79.98 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 56 current US$ per square kilometre 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre 52.71 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 57.71 current US$ per square kilometre 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre 51.78 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 166.54 current US$ per square kilometre 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre 154.82 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 294.63 current US$ per square kilometre 12.89 current US$ per square kilometre 281.74 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Bangladesh or Lower middle income?
Bangladesh, at 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.73 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Bangladesh and Lower middle income?
148.5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Lower middle income?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Lower middle income rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Lower middle income ranks 18th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Lower middle income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/lower-middle-income/">Bangladesh vs Lower middle income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.