Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.53 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 35.7%
Rank
27th
of 46 groups
All-time high
26.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0.0155 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Low income, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Low income stood at 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 35.7% on the previous year and down 76.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Low income peaked at 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0155 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Low income 27th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.0155 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0228 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 1967 | 0.021 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0283 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0896 current US$ per square kilometre | +216.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0384 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.1% |
| 1971 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1972 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0777 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.8% |
| 1974 | 0.0439 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 1975 | 0.2267 current US$ per square kilometre | +416.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0686 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.8% |
| 1977 | 0.2121 current US$ per square kilometre | +209.3% |
| 1978 | 0.1965 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1979 | 0.2431 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1980 | 0.3638 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.6% |
| 1981 | 0.9899 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.1% |
| 1982 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.2% |
| 1983 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1984 | 0.7449 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.5% |
| 1985 | 0.4698 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.9% |
| 1986 | 0.4022 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1987 | 0.5356 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 1988 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +128.2% |
| 1989 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.8% |
| 1990 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.1% |
| 1991 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 1992 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1993 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1994 | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.8% |
| 1995 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1996 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1997 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1998 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.0% |
| 1999 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2000 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2001 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 2002 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.0% |
| 2003 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2004 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.7% |
| 2005 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2006 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2007 | 7.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.9% |
| 2008 | 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.6% |
| 2009 | 10.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2010 | 12.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2011 | 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.5% |
| 2012 | 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2013 | 19.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2014 | 15.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 2015 | 9.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.6% |
| 2016 | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2017 | 11.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 2018 | 9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2019 | 9.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2020 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.5% |
| 2021 | 5.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2022 | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2023 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0355 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0155 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0896 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.1191 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0384 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2431 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9934 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3638 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 24 Philippines 213.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Mauritius 167.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Lao People's Democratic Republic 156.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Myanmar 154.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Antigua and Barbuda 137.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Nepal 128.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Indonesia 115.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Low income was 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 26.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0155 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Low income ranks 27th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 76.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.