Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.8117 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) is 0.8117 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 39.3% on the previous year and down 60.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0.2525 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 35th out of 44 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.2525 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.4461 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.7% |
| 1972 | 0.4683 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1973 | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.2% |
| 1974 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1975 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1976 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1977 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1978 | 0.6702 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 1979 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +229.2% |
| 1980 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.9% |
| 1981 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.8% |
| 1982 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1983 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 1984 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.4% |
| 1985 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 1987 | 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.0% |
| 1988 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1989 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 1990 | 0.8777 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1991 | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +267.1% |
| 1992 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1993 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1994 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1995 | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1996 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.6% |
| 1997 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 1998 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.1% |
| 1999 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2000 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +155.3% |
| 2001 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.9% |
| 2002 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2003 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 2006 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.9% |
| 2007 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2008 | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 2009 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2010 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2011 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 2012 | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2013 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2014 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 2016 | 0.9536 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2017 | 0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2018 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +230.9% |
| 2019 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 2020 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.8% |
| 2021 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2022 | 0.8117 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2525 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8777 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8117 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 32 Jamaica 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Ecuador 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Togo 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Kenya 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Mali 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Seychelles 14.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Israel 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 0.8117 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2525 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 35th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.