Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.33 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 20.7%
Rank
31st
of 44 groups
All-time high
6.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) is 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.7% on the previous year and down 70.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 31st of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1063 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0202 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0691 current US$ per square kilometre | +242.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0856 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1969 | 0.109 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 1970 | 0.202 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.4% |
| 1971 | 0.1861 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1972 | 0.1978 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1973 | 0.3717 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.9% |
| 1974 | 0.4615 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1975 | 0.8172 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 1976 | 0.7731 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1977 | 0.7019 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1978 | 0.8167 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 1980 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1981 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1982 | 0.8188 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1983 | 0.9353 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1984 | 0.9225 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1985 | 0.7327 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1986 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1987 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1988 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1989 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1990 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.0% |
| 1991 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1992 | 3.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1993 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1994 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1995 | 5.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.3% |
| 1996 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1997 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1998 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1999 | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2000 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2001 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2002 | 3.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2003 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2004 | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2005 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 4.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2008 | 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 2009 | 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2010 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2012 | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2013 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2015 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2016 | 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2017 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2018 | 3.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2019 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2020 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2022 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2023 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0525 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.109 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5855 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1861 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7327 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 28 Niger 21.93 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Guatemala 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Cambodia 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Morocco 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Jamaica 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Ecuador 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Togo 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 31st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.