Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean stood at 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.7% on the previous year and down 70.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 33rd out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0996 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0667 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0877 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1081 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1968 | 0.1041 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1778 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1970 | 0.1893 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1971 | 0.1743 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1972 | 0.1853 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1973 | 0.3482 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.9% |
| 1974 | 0.4324 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1975 | 0.7656 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 1976 | 0.7243 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1977 | 0.6575 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1978 | 0.7651 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 1980 | 0.9733 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1981 | 0.9459 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1982 | 0.7671 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1983 | 0.8762 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1984 | 0.8642 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1985 | 0.6864 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1986 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1987 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1988 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1989 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1990 | 2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.0% |
| 1991 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1992 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.9% |
| 1993 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1994 | 2.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1995 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.3% |
| 1996 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1997 | 2.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1998 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1999 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 2000 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2001 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2002 | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2003 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 2004 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 2005 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2008 | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.7% |
| 2009 | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2010 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2012 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2013 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 4.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2015 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2016 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2017 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2018 | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2019 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2020 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2021 | 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2022 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2023 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0716 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1778 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.5485 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1743 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9844 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6864 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 30 Cambodia 20.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Morocco 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Jamaica 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Ecuador 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Togo 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Kenya 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Mali 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean was 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 6.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 33rd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.