Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.6989 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.6989 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 11.4%
Rank
36th
of 44 groups
All-time high
11.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1979
All-time low
-6.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in South Asia stood at 0.6989 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 11.4% on the previous year and down 60.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in South Asia peaked at 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1979 and was at its lowest, -6.12 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2004.
That places South Asia 36th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0268 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0.6436 current US$ per square kilometre | +2300.0% |
| 1968 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.6% |
| 1969 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.6% |
| 1970 | 0.3337 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.4% |
| 1971 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +600.0% |
| 1972 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 1973 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.1% |
| 1974 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.4% |
| 1975 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1976 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.5% |
| 1977 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +231.4% |
| 1978 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1979 | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +215.5% |
| 1980 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.7% |
| 1981 | 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.5% |
| 1982 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.1% |
| 1983 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1984 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1985 | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1986 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1987 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1988 | 0.6079 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.9% |
| 1989 | -0.4738 current US$ per square kilometre | -177.9% |
| 1990 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -1067.3% |
| 1991 | 0.3963 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.4% |
| 1992 | 0.9505 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.8% |
| 1993 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +187.8% |
| 1994 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0717 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.0% |
| 1996 | -0.6449 current US$ per square kilometre | -1000.0% |
| 1997 | -1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +149.1% |
| 1998 | -0.8629 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.2896 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2000 | -0.6837 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.1% |
| 2001 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -659.4% |
| 2002 | -2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -156.2% |
| 2003 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -197.8% |
| 2004 | -6.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -391.3% |
| 2005 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -128.4% |
| 2006 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2007 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 2008 | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +216.4% |
| 2009 | 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2010 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.6% |
| 2011 | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2012 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 2013 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2014 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2015 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2016 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2017 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2018 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 2019 | 0.9205 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.0% |
| 2020 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 2021 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2022 | 0.6275 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2023 | 0.6989 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.394 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3337 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4738 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7712 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9205 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8857 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6275 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 33 Ecuador 18.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Togo 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Kenya 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Mali 15.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Seychelles 14.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Israel 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in South Asia was 0.6989 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1979.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- South Asia ranks 36th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.