Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps was 3.14 million current US$ in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Chile, 1960–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2017, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Chile stood at 3.14 million current US$.
The figure is up 28.8% on the previous year and down 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Chile peaked at 5.55 million current US$ in 1962 and was at its lowest, -1.52 million current US$, in 1967.
That places Chile 75th out of 167 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 1.60 million current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 960,000 current US$ | -40.0% |
| 1962 | 5.55 million current US$ | +478.1% |
| 1963 | 5.41 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 1964 | 4.32 million current US$ | -20.1% |
| 1965 | 1.27 million current US$ | -70.6% |
| 1966 | -850,000 current US$ | -166.9% |
| 1967 | -1.52 million current US$ | +78.8% |
| 1968 | 60,000 current US$ | -103.9% |
| 1969 | 160,000 current US$ | +166.7% |
| 1970 | 2.33 million current US$ | +1356.2% |
| 1971 | 1.10 million current US$ | -52.8% |
| 1972 | 2.15 million current US$ | +95.5% |
| 1973 | 1.16 million current US$ | -46.0% |
| 1974 | 1.35 million current US$ | +16.4% |
| 1975 | 70,000 current US$ | -94.8% |
| 1976 | -150,000 current US$ | -314.3% |
| 1977 | -190,000 current US$ | +26.7% |
| 1978 | -260,000 current US$ | +36.8% |
| 1979 | -240,000 current US$ | -7.7% |
| 1980 | -250,000 current US$ | +4.2% |
| 1981 | -50,000 current US$ | -80.0% |
| 1982 | 1.94 million current US$ | -3980.0% |
| 1983 | 2.08 million current US$ | +7.2% |
| 1984 | 3.60 million current US$ | +73.1% |
| 1985 | 3.82 million current US$ | +6.1% |
| 1986 | 2.16 million current US$ | -43.5% |
| 1987 | 2.60 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 1988 | 3.17 million current US$ | +21.9% |
| 1989 | 4.15 million current US$ | +30.9% |
| 1990 | 3.25 million current US$ | -21.7% |
| 1991 | 2.49 million current US$ | -23.4% |
| 1992 | 3.94 million current US$ | +58.2% |
| 1993 | 2.97 million current US$ | -24.6% |
| 1994 | 2.55 million current US$ | -14.1% |
| 1995 | 1.60 million current US$ | -37.3% |
| 1996 | 1.51 million current US$ | -5.6% |
| 1997 | 1.27 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 1998 | 1.12 million current US$ | -11.8% |
| 1999 | 790,000 current US$ | -29.5% |
| 2000 | 800,000 current US$ | +1.3% |
| 2001 | 650,000 current US$ | -18.8% |
| 2002 | 1.63 million current US$ | +150.8% |
| 2003 | 2.79 million current US$ | +71.2% |
| 2004 | 3.52 million current US$ | +26.2% |
| 2005 | 3.83 million current US$ | +8.8% |
| 2006 | 2.54 million current US$ | -33.7% |
| 2007 | 3.46 million current US$ | +36.2% |
| 2008 | 2.50 million current US$ | -27.7% |
| 2009 | 1.98 million current US$ | -20.8% |
| 2010 | 2.68 million current US$ | +35.4% |
| 2011 | 1.70 million current US$ | -36.6% |
| 2012 | 2.75 million current US$ | +61.7% |
| 2013 | 2.55 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 2014 | 973,033 current US$ | -61.8% |
| 2015 | 422,534 current US$ | -56.6% |
| 2016 | 2.44 million current US$ | +477.6% |
| 2017 | 3.14 million current US$ | +28.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.70 million current US$ | -1.52 million current US$ | 5.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 732,000 current US$ | -260,000 current US$ | 2.33 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.32 million current US$ | -250,000 current US$ | 4.15 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.15 million current US$ | 790,000 current US$ | 3.94 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.37 million current US$ | 650,000 current US$ | 3.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.08 million current US$ | 422,534 current US$ | 3.14 million current US$ | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Chile was 3.14 million current US$ in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 5.55 million current US$ in 1962.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.52 million current US$ in 1967.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 75th out of 167 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.