Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.71 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 67.7%
World rank
120th
of 166 countries
All-time high
66.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
60
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zambia, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zambia stood at 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 67.7% on the previous year and up 0.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zambia peaked at 66.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1964.
Zambia ranks 120th of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.148 current US$ per square kilometre | +1000.0% |
| 1966 | 0.565 current US$ per square kilometre | +281.8% |
| 1967 | 0.5919 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 0.8071 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1969 | 0.7399 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1970 | 0.7533 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1971 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.2% |
| 1972 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1973 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 1974 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 1975 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.6% |
| 1976 | 8.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1977 | 15.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.3% |
| 1978 | 21.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1979 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.2% |
| 1980 | 21.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +359.9% |
| 1981 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.5% |
| 1982 | 22.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.7% |
| 1983 | 14.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.3% |
| 1984 | 25.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.9% |
| 1985 | 14.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1986 | 17.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1987 | 34.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.2% |
| 1988 | 40.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1989 | 21.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.7% |
| 1990 | 18.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1991 | 31.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.5% |
| 1992 | 34.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1993 | 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.7% |
| 1994 | 13.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1995 | 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.0% |
| 1996 | 12.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.1% |
| 1997 | 15.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1998 | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.4% |
| 1999 | 12.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2000 | 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2001 | 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 16.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 2003 | 23.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 2004 | 33.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.5% |
| 2005 | 66.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.0% |
| 2006 | 14.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.6% |
| 2007 | 32.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.4% |
| 2008 | 19.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2009 | 17.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2010 | 11.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 2011 | 10.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2012 | 8.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 2013 | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 10.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2015 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 2016 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 2017 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 2018 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.9% |
| 2019 | 5.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2020 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 2021 | 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.6% |
| 2022 | 23.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.7% |
| 2023 | 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4775 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8071 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1970s | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7533 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 22.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 19.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 24.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 12.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 117 Lesotho 8.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Romania 8.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 South Korea 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Montenegro 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Egypt 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Bahamas 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Zambia was 7.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 66.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Zambia ranks 120th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.