Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in IDA & IBRD total
IDA & IBRD total: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) was -10 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in IDA & IBRD total, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
IDA & IBRD total recorded -10 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in 2022.
That represents a change of down 133.5% on the previous year and up 40.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in IDA & IBRD total peaked at 61.2 % change on previous year in 1986 and was at its lowest, -27.9 % change on previous year, in 2015.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in IDA & IBRD total, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | -5.68 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 17.16 % change on previous year | -402.1% |
| 1973 | 58.47 % change on previous year | +240.8% |
| 1974 | 33.5 % change on previous year | -42.7% |
| 1975 | 25.05 % change on previous year | -25.2% |
| 1976 | 5.63 % change on previous year | -77.5% |
| 1977 | 30.13 % change on previous year | +435.2% |
| 1978 | 44.38 % change on previous year | +47.3% |
| 1979 | 18.52 % change on previous year | -58.3% |
| 1980 | 0.9681 % change on previous year | -94.8% |
| 1981 | -22.77 % change on previous year | -2451.6% |
| 1982 | 9.48 % change on previous year | -141.6% |
| 1983 | 5.79 % change on previous year | -38.9% |
| 1984 | -6.12 % change on previous year | -205.7% |
| 1985 | 8.75 % change on previous year | -243.1% |
| 1986 | 61.2 % change on previous year | +599.4% |
| 1987 | 16.62 % change on previous year | -72.8% |
| 1988 | 4.89 % change on previous year | -70.6% |
| 1989 | 6.56 % change on previous year | +34.2% |
| 1990 | 11.7 % change on previous year | +78.4% |
| 1991 | 3.71 % change on previous year | -68.3% |
| 1992 | 2.75 % change on previous year | -25.9% |
| 1993 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -177.2% |
| 1994 | 8.23 % change on previous year | -487.2% |
| 1995 | 11.89 % change on previous year | +44.5% |
| 1996 | 28.11 % change on previous year | +136.5% |
| 1997 | -7.8 % change on previous year | -127.8% |
| 1998 | 5.86 % change on previous year | -175.1% |
| 1999 | 2.7 % change on previous year | -54.0% |
| 2000 | -8.56 % change on previous year | -417.5% |
| 2001 | 6.74 % change on previous year | -178.7% |
| 2002 | -4.76 % change on previous year | -170.7% |
| 2003 | -0.0667 % change on previous year | -98.6% |
| 2004 | 21.63 % change on previous year | -32533.9% |
| 2005 | 9.8 % change on previous year | -54.7% |
| 2006 | 12.77 % change on previous year | +30.3% |
| 2007 | 11.58 % change on previous year | -9.3% |
| 2008 | 7.96 % change on previous year | -31.2% |
| 2009 | -1.86 % change on previous year | -123.3% |
| 2010 | 3.36 % change on previous year | -281.1% |
| 2011 | -4.18 % change on previous year | -224.4% |
| 2012 | -16.78 % change on previous year | +301.1% |
| 2013 | -14.28 % change on previous year | -14.9% |
| 2014 | 1.77 % change on previous year | -112.4% |
| 2015 | -27.9 % change on previous year | -1679.1% |
| 2016 | -1.28 % change on previous year | -95.4% |
| 2017 | 7.03 % change on previous year | -649.8% |
| 2018 | 1.48 % change on previous year | -78.9% |
| 2019 | -0.6136 % change on previous year | -141.4% |
| 2020 | -5.27 % change on previous year | +759.5% |
| 2021 | 29.81 % change on previous year | -665.2% |
| 2022 | -10 % change on previous year | -133.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 25.24 % change on previous year | -5.68 % change on previous year | 58.47 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 8.54 % change on previous year | -22.77 % change on previous year | 61.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.5 % change on previous year | -7.8 % change on previous year | 28.11 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.52 % change on previous year | -8.56 % change on previous year | 21.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -5.14 % change on previous year | -27.9 % change on previous year | 7.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.85 % change on previous year | -10 % change on previous year | 29.81 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA & IBRD total
- 20 Côte d'Ivoire 36.94 % change on previous year compare
- 21 Brazil 33.89 % change on previous year compare
- 22 Argentina 33.02 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Congo 23.12 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Libya 21.65 % change on previous year compare
- 25 Iraq 19.79 % change on previous year compare
- 26 Ghana 14.9 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA & IBRD total
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 442.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 597.18 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 4.38 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 19.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 11.58 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 6.85 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.80 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.98 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in IDA & IBRD total?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in IDA & IBRD total was -10 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The highest recorded value was 61.2 % change on previous year in 1986.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in IDA & IBRD total?
- The lowest recorded value was -27.9 % change on previous year in 2015.
- How does IDA & IBRD total rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$)?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) rising or falling in IDA & IBRD total?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA & IBRD total data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.