Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend
Early-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 287.24 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend is 287.24 million current US$, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and down 29.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend peaked at 563.91 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 11.07 million current US$, in 1971.
That places Early-demographic dividend 15th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 14.89 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 11.07 million current US$ | -25.7% |
| 1972 | 13.32 million current US$ | +20.3% |
| 1973 | 25.54 million current US$ | +91.7% |
| 1974 | 30.85 million current US$ | +20.8% |
| 1975 | 39.75 million current US$ | +28.8% |
| 1976 | 30.27 million current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1977 | 47.32 million current US$ | +56.3% |
| 1978 | 74.20 million current US$ | +56.8% |
| 1979 | 98.72 million current US$ | +33.0% |
| 1980 | 90.90 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 1981 | 86.82 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 1982 | 70.09 million current US$ | -19.3% |
| 1983 | 84.15 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 1984 | 77.58 million current US$ | -7.8% |
| 1985 | 94.31 million current US$ | +21.6% |
| 1986 | 113.30 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 1987 | 179.01 million current US$ | +58.0% |
| 1988 | 160.83 million current US$ | -10.2% |
| 1989 | 179.32 million current US$ | +11.5% |
| 1990 | 202.70 million current US$ | +13.0% |
| 1991 | 209.82 million current US$ | +3.5% |
| 1992 | 201.70 million current US$ | -3.9% |
| 1993 | 230.73 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 1994 | 249.25 million current US$ | +8.0% |
| 1995 | 275.92 million current US$ | +10.7% |
| 1996 | 318.27 million current US$ | +15.3% |
| 1997 | 310.37 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 1998 | 334.26 million current US$ | +7.7% |
| 1999 | 332.49 million current US$ | -0.5% |
| 2000 | 312.28 million current US$ | -6.1% |
| 2001 | 301.07 million current US$ | -3.6% |
| 2002 | 281.59 million current US$ | -6.5% |
| 2003 | 250.94 million current US$ | -10.9% |
| 2004 | 320.91 million current US$ | +27.9% |
| 2005 | 348.69 million current US$ | +8.7% |
| 2006 | 322.01 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 2007 | 374.35 million current US$ | +16.3% |
| 2008 | 439.51 million current US$ | +17.4% |
| 2009 | 414.70 million current US$ | -5.6% |
| 2010 | 563.91 million current US$ | +36.0% |
| 2011 | 444.56 million current US$ | -21.2% |
| 2012 | 405.87 million current US$ | -8.7% |
| 2013 | 340.10 million current US$ | -16.2% |
| 2014 | 345.29 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 2015 | 240.19 million current US$ | -30.4% |
| 2016 | 241.79 million current US$ | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 298.74 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 2018 | 316.27 million current US$ | +5.9% |
| 2019 | 297.78 million current US$ | -5.8% |
| 2020 | 221.09 million current US$ | -25.8% |
| 2021 | 286.86 million current US$ | +29.7% |
| 2022 | 287.24 million current US$ | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 38.59 million current US$ | 11.07 million current US$ | 98.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 113.63 million current US$ | 70.09 million current US$ | 179.32 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 266.55 million current US$ | 201.70 million current US$ | 334.26 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 336.61 million current US$ | 250.94 million current US$ | 439.51 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 349.45 million current US$ | 240.19 million current US$ | 563.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 265.06 million current US$ | 221.09 million current US$ | 287.24 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Early-demographic dividend
- 12 Yemen 25.35 million current US$ compare
- 13 Bangladesh 21.20 million current US$ compare
- 14 Kosovo 19.06 million current US$ compare
- 15 Lebanon 18.94 million current US$ compare
- 16 Sudan 14.88 million current US$ compare
- 17 Tanzania, United Republic of 14.45 million current US$ compare
- 18 Rwanda 14.03 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Early-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 171.18 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 148.03 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 907.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.23 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 543.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.19 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.32 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 374.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.62 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Early-demographic dividend was 287.24 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 563.91 million current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.07 million current US$ in 1971.
- How does Early-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Early-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Early-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.