Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific is 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 6.3% on the previous year and up 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 42nd of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0713 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0648 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1963 | 0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0148 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0594 current US$ per square kilometre | +1108.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1123 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.3% |
| 1969 | 0.1886 current US$ per square kilometre | +607.7% |
| 1970 | 0.2697 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.0% |
| 1971 | 0.1058 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1685 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 1974 | 0.5222 current US$ per square kilometre | +823.2% |
| 1975 | 0.5497 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1976 | 0.414 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1977 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.9% |
| 1978 | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.9% |
| 1979 | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1980 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1981 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.4% |
| 1982 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1983 | 2.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1984 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 1985 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1986 | 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.1% |
| 1987 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 1988 | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1989 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 1990 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1991 | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1992 | 9.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.4% |
| 1993 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1994 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1995 | 11.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.2% |
| 1996 | 10.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1997 | 11.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 11.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1999 | 9.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2000 | 10.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2001 | 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2002 | 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2003 | 11.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2004 | 13.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2005 | 17.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 2006 | 18.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2007 | 21.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2008 | 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 21.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 21.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2011 | 33.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 2012 | 25.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2013 | 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2014 | 20.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 22.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2016 | 24.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 2017 | 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2018 | 29.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 2019 | 24.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2020 | 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.8% |
| 2021 | 28.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2022 | 23.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 2023 | 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1966 | +1108.3% | 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0594 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1974 | +823.2% | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5222 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1969 | +607.7% | 0.0266 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1886 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0641 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1886 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.8525 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 28.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Latvia 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Tonga 1,938 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Croatia 1,883 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific was 25.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 36.64 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0049 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 42nd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.