Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Late-demographic dividend
Late-demographic dividend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 58.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Late-demographic dividend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Late-demographic dividend is 58.71 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 13.0% on the previous year and down 22.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Late-demographic dividend peaked at 83.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Late-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.2314 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1972 | 0.4433 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.6% |
| 1973 | 0.5705 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 1974 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.2% |
| 1975 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1976 | 0.7567 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 1977 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.3% |
| 1978 | 3.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.5% |
| 1979 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 1980 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1981 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +158.7% |
| 1982 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.0% |
| 1983 | 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1984 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 1985 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.3% |
| 1986 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1987 | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1988 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1989 | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1990 | 25.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +240.5% |
| 1991 | 21.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1992 | 21.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1993 | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 1994 | 29.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.7% |
| 1995 | 32.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1996 | 34.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1998 | 40.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1999 | 55.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2000 | 57.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 61.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2002 | 37.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 2003 | 56.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 2004 | 83.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 2005 | 27.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
| 2006 | 37.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2007 | 35.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2008 | 43.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2009 | 41.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2010 | 38.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2011 | 83.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.4% |
| 2012 | 76.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2013 | 68.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2014 | 57.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 55.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2016 | 60.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2017 | 57.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2018 | 61.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2019 | 41.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2020 | 83.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.2% |
| 2021 | 67.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2022 | 58.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 31.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 48.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 60 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 70.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 83.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Late-demographic dividend
- 33 Maldives 2,940 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Singapore 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Late-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 122.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 23.75 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 162.86 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.61 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 264.38 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.84 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.48 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 153.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -126.37 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Late-demographic dividend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Late-demographic dividend was 58.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 83.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Late-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1914 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Late-demographic dividend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Late-demographic dividend ranks 36th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Late-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Late-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.