Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) recorded 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.9% on the previous year and down 21.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 67.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0606 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.2366 current US$ per square kilometre | +290.4% |
| 1965 | 0.1515 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.0% |
| 1966 | 0.3196 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.9% |
| 1967 | 0.1983 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1968 | 0.2706 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1969 | 0.1361 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 1970 | 0.4902 current US$ per square kilometre | +260.2% |
| 1971 | 0.7385 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 1972 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.8% |
| 1973 | 0.8475 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1974 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1975 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1976 | 0.7353 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.4% |
| 1977 | 0.9932 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1978 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.1% |
| 1979 | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1980 | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.9% |
| 1981 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1983 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1984 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.9% |
| 1985 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1986 | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1987 | 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 1988 | 12.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1989 | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1990 | 12.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1991 | 12.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1992 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1993 | 17.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1994 | 22 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1995 | 31.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1996 | 33.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1997 | 27.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.2% |
| 1998 | 32.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1999 | 27.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 2000 | 17.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 2001 | 28.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.2% |
| 2002 | 16.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 2003 | 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 2004 | 30.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2005 | 33.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2006 | 40.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2007 | 52.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2008 | 55.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 58.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2010 | 66.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2011 | 66.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 63.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2013 | 50.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2014 | 34.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2015 | 55.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.3% |
| 2016 | 57.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 41.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2018 | 64.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2019 | 39.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2020 | 67.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 2021 | 50.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2022 | 44.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2023 | 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1527 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3196 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4902 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 23.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 35.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 54.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 50.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 67.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 34 Singapore 2,791 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 67.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 37th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.