Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per was 0.3687 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Chile, 1971–2016
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Chile is 0.3687 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2016.
That represents a change of up 28.0% on the previous year and up 291.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, -0.9011 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
That places Chile 108th out of 145 countries with data for 2016, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0.3497 current US$ per square kilometre | +1200.0% |
| 1973 | 0.5514 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.7% |
| 1974 | 0.2017 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0538 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1986 | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0807 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1988 | 0.1748 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.7% |
| 1989 | 0.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.1% |
| 1990 | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +1813.8% |
| 1991 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1992 | 0.7397 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.4% |
| 1993 | 0.2555 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.5% |
| 1994 | -0.5649 current US$ per square kilometre | -321.1% |
| 1995 | -0.5111 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1996 | -0.6321 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1997 | -0.659 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1998 | -0.7666 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1999 | -0.9011 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2000 | -0.8339 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0807 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2003 | 0.1748 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.7% |
| 2004 | 0.1748 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.1614 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0941 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 2007 | 0.2286 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.9% |
| 2008 | 0.4438 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.1% |
| 2009 | 0.2824 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2010 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +290.5% |
| 2011 | 0.4035 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.4% |
| 2012 | 0.8611 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.4% |
| 2013 | 0.6605 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2014 | 0.3848 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 2015 | 0.288 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2016 | 0.3687 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1995 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5514 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
| 1980s | 0.1061 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 0.6294 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9011 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0874 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8339 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4438 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5813 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.288 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 105 Peru 0.3859 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Uruguay 0.3851 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Djibouti 0.3779 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 North Macedonia 0.3181 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Mongolia 0.3097 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Chile was 0.3687 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 7.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9011 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 108th out of 145 countries with data for 2016.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 291.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.