Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Zambia, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Zambia is 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 94.8% on the previous year and up 95.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Zambia peaked at 139.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, -10.74 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2018.
That places Zambia 151st out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.6995 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1982 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.7% |
| 1983 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1984 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.3% |
| 1985 | 0.9147 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 1986 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +382.4% |
| 1987 | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.4% |
| 1988 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1989 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1990 | 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +1417.0% |
| 1991 | 26.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1992 | 19.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1993 | 19.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 15.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1995 | 10.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1996 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.5% |
| 1997 | 4.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.8% |
| 1998 | 14.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +235.4% |
| 1999 | 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.6% |
| 2000 | 17.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 2001 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.0% |
| 2002 | 13.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2003 | 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.2% |
| 2004 | 139.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +4819.4% |
| 2005 | 21.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.8% |
| 2006 | 85.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +303.0% |
| 2007 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.3% |
| 2008 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2009 | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +504.1% |
| 2010 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.6% |
| 2011 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.8071 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2014 | 34.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +4120.0% |
| 2015 | 39.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2016 | 56.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2017 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.3% |
| 2018 | -10.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -434.6% |
| 2019 | -6.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 2020 | -4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.9% |
| 2021 | 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -254.0% |
| 2022 | 30.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +381.3% |
| 2023 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6995 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 30.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 139.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 148 Samoa 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 149 Kazakhstan 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 150 Russian Federation 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 152 Guyana 0.9198 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 153 Turkmenistan 0.7967 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Namibia 0.771 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Zambia was 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 139.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Zambia ranks 151st out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 95.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.