Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2017)
0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 33.8%
World rank
126th
of 153 countries
All-time high
26.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1989
All-time low
-6.43 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1977
Years of data
57
1961–2017
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Chile, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Chile stood at 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 33.8% on the previous year and up 121.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 26.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989 and was at its lowest, -6.43 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1977.
Chile ranks 126th of 153 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +319.1% |
| 1963 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 1964 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.5% |
| 1965 | -2 current US$ per square kilometre | -192.5% |
| 1966 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -287.9% |
| 1967 | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +168.6% |
| 1968 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0807 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.8% |
| 1970 | -2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -3733.3% |
| 1971 | -1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 1972 | 0.2421 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.0% |
| 1973 | 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1655.6% |
| 1974 | 0.1748 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.9% |
| 1975 | 0.1614 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1977 | -6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -16033.3% |
| 1978 | -0.7935 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.7% |
| 1979 | -0.7935 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.4% |
| 1981 | -0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1982 | 0.3631 current US$ per square kilometre | -235.0% |
| 1983 | 0.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1984 | 0.4035 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1985 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +343.3% |
| 1986 | 0.7128 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 1987 | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +549.1% |
| 1988 | 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +211.0% |
| 1989 | 26.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.8% |
| 1990 | 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.8% |
| 1991 | 21.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 1992 | 23.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1993 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.5% |
| 1994 | 12.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.0% |
| 1995 | 9.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1996 | 15.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.6% |
| 1997 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.5% |
| 1998 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1999 | -1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -200.0% |
| 2000 | 0.7397 current US$ per square kilometre | -167.1% |
| 2001 | -0.2421 current US$ per square kilometre | -132.7% |
| 2002 | -0.7397 current US$ per square kilometre | +205.6% |
| 2003 | -0.9818 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 2004 | -0.4842 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 2005 | -1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +263.9% |
| 2006 | -1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2007 | -1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0672 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.7% |
| 2009 | -1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -2220.0% |
| 2010 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -271.7% |
| 2011 | -0.4842 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.8% |
| 2012 | -1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +183.3% |
| 2013 | -0.4707 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0809 current US$ per square kilometre | -117.2% |
| 2015 | 0.5536 current US$ per square kilometre | +584.3% |
| 2016 | 0.3262 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2017 | 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | -0.7424 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 10.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.7263 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7397 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1622 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 123 Hungary 0.3347 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Gabon 0.3199 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 125 Malaysia 0.2906 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Poland 0.1959 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Oman 0.1939 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 129 Vanuatu 0.1858 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Chile was 0.2161 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 26.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 1977.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 126th out of 153 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 121.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.