Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.33 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 35.5%
Rank
34th
of 44 groups
All-time high
22.9 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1991
All-time low
-1.13 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean is 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 35.5% on the previous year and up 160.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 22.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, -1.13 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -0.2391 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -813.3% |
| 1963 | 0.9918 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1964 | 0.3701 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 1965 | -1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -404.2% |
| 1966 | -0.5235 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.5% |
| 1967 | 0.6725 current US$ per square kilometre | -228.4% |
| 1968 | -0.387 current US$ per square kilometre | -157.6% |
| 1969 | -0.667 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 1970 | -0.5126 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1971 | -0.1121 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.1% |
| 1972 | -0.2884 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.3% |
| 1973 | 0.4418 current US$ per square kilometre | -253.2% |
| 1974 | 0.009 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.0% |
| 1975 | 0.268 current US$ per square kilometre | +2888.9% |
| 1976 | 0.2087 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 1977 | -0.0329 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.8% |
| 1978 | 0.2326 current US$ per square kilometre | -807.6% |
| 1979 | 0.3691 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1980 | 0.3332 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1981 | 0.6705 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.2% |
| 1982 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.0% |
| 1983 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1984 | 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.3% |
| 1985 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.1% |
| 1986 | 5.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.0% |
| 1987 | 6.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1988 | 13.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.2% |
| 1989 | 20.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1990 | 17.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1991 | 22.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1992 | 18.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1993 | 13.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1994 | 14.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1995 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.3% |
| 1996 | 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1997 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.9% |
| 1998 | 6.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +261.2% |
| 1999 | 0.2494 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.9% |
| 2000 | -0.4529 current US$ per square kilometre | -281.6% |
| 2001 | -0.5717 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2002 | 0.8411 current US$ per square kilometre | -247.1% |
| 2003 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.1% |
| 2004 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 2005 | 6.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 2006 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.4% |
| 2007 | 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2008 | 6.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 2009 | 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.0% |
| 2010 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 2011 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2012 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
| 2013 | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 2014 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2015 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2016 | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2017 | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +195.4% |
| 2018 | -0.2651 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.3% |
| 2019 | -0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.2% |
| 2020 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -471.4% |
| 2021 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2022 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.6% |
| 2023 | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0886 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0583 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5126 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4418 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3332 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 10.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2494 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5717 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6951 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 31 Ukraine 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Türkiye 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 33.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Uganda 33.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Kenya 29.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Sierra Leone 28.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean was 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 22.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.13 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is up 160.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.