Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.32 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 51.8%
Rank
31st
of 44 groups
All-time high
28.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
-0.3783 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1974
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Middle income stood at 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 51.8% on the previous year and up 119.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, -0.3783 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1974.
Middle income ranks 31st of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6953 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1963 | 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.0% |
| 1964 | 0.8611 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1965 | 0.8229 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1966 | 0.5085 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 1967 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +237.9% |
| 1968 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1969 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1970 | 0.7613 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.8% |
| 1971 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +160.0% |
| 1972 | 0.5271 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.4% |
| 1973 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +182.0% |
| 1974 | -0.3783 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.5% |
| 1975 | 0.6476 current US$ per square kilometre | -271.2% |
| 1976 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 1977 | 0.312 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0158 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 1979 | -0.112 current US$ per square kilometre | -807.6% |
| 1980 | 0.1348 current US$ per square kilometre | -220.4% |
| 1981 | 0.7581 current US$ per square kilometre | +462.2% |
| 1982 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.7% |
| 1983 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.8% |
| 1984 | 4.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.5% |
| 1985 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1986 | 10.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.4% |
| 1987 | 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 1988 | 18.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1989 | 20.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1990 | 18.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1991 | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 1992 | 25.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1993 | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1994 | 21.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 1996 | 7.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1997 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 1998 | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1999 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2000 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.1% |
| 2001 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 2002 | 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.1% |
| 2003 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2004 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2005 | 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +604.1% |
| 2006 | 26.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2007 | 13.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2008 | 20.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.1% |
| 2009 | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.9% |
| 2010 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2011 | 5.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 2012 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 2013 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 2014 | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2015 | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2016 | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.3% |
| 2018 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 2019 | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2020 | 7.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2021 | 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2022 | 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.0% |
| 2023 | 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5085 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6298 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3783 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1348 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 28 Burundi 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Djibouti 60.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Hong Kong 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ukraine 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Turkey 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 33.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Middle income was 7.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 28.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3783 current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 31st out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 119.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.