Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
1.38 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 74.6%
World rank
108th
of 153 countries
All-time high
69.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
-4.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1974
Years of data
58
1964–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Zambia, 1964–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Zambia stood at 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 74.6% on the previous year and down 7.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Zambia peaked at 69.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, -4.01 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1974.
Zambia ranks 108th of 153 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1964 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 24.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +89799.9% |
| 1968 | 16.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1969 | -0.7264 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.3% |
| 1970 | -2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +294.4% |
| 1971 | -2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1972 | -2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1973 | -1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 1974 | -4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.3% |
| 1975 | 0.2556 current US$ per square kilometre | -106.4% |
| 1976 | 0.2421 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1977 | -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -811.1% |
| 1978 | -1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1980 | -2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1981 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -244.4% |
| 1982 | 0.5784 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.6% |
| 1983 | 0.9147 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1984 | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +416.2% |
| 1985 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.0% |
| 1986 | 18.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +947.7% |
| 1987 | 48.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +165.2% |
| 1988 | 53.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1989 | 31.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 1990 | 16.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 1991 | 56.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +244.4% |
| 1992 | 8.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.1% |
| 1993 | 69.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +719.3% |
| 1994 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.3% |
| 1995 | 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.3% |
| 1996 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.2% |
| 1997 | 25.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +1778.0% |
| 1998 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1999 | 0.7668 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.6% |
| 2000 | 32.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +4114.0% |
| 2001 | 0.5784 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.2% |
| 2002 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.3% |
| 2003 | 36.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +2760.4% |
| 2004 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.7% |
| 2005 | 0.3094 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.7% |
| 2006 | 69.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +22360.9% |
| 2007 | 0.6053 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.1% |
| 2008 | 7.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +1202.2% |
| 2009 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2010 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 2011 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.3% |
| 2012 | 0.7668 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 2013 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.0% |
| 2014 | 0.5112 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.5% |
| 2015 | 0.6898 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 2016 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.8% |
| 2017 | 0.763 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.9% |
| 2018 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.3% |
| 2019 | 0.5027 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 2020 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.6% |
| 2021 | 0.9316 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2022 | 5.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +480.4% |
| 2023 | 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7264 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | -1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2556 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 19.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7668 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3094 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5027 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9316 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 105 Bhutan 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 106 Zimbabwe 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 107 Jamaica 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 109 Panama 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Papua New Guinea 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 Cyprus 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in Zambia was 1.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 69.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 1974.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- Zambia ranks 108th out of 153 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.