Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was -82.81 % change on previous year in 2012. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Chile, 1968–2012
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Chile recorded -82.81 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2012.
That represents a change of down 54.6% on the previous year and down 400.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Chile peaked at 587.93 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -87.48 % change on previous year, in 1999.
Chile ranks 130th of 156 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 330.77 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 30.36 % change on previous year | -90.8% |
| 1970 | 212.33 % change on previous year | +599.4% |
| 1971 | -37.72 % change on previous year | -117.8% |
| 1972 | -56.34 % change on previous year | +49.4% |
| 1973 | 508.06 % change on previous year | -1001.8% |
| 1974 | 2.12 % change on previous year | -99.6% |
| 1975 | -70.39 % change on previous year | -3417.1% |
| 1976 | 54.39 % change on previous year | -177.3% |
| 1977 | 69.89 % change on previous year | +28.5% |
| 1978 | -17.73 % change on previous year | -125.4% |
| 1979 | 19.92 % change on previous year | -212.4% |
| 1980 | 98.98 % change on previous year | +396.9% |
| 1981 | -27.26 % change on previous year | -127.5% |
| 1982 | -0.9368 % change on previous year | -96.6% |
| 1983 | -4.96 % change on previous year | +430.0% |
| 1984 | -22.89 % change on previous year | +361.0% |
| 1985 | 51.61 % change on previous year | -325.5% |
| 1986 | -4.26 % change on previous year | -108.2% |
| 1987 | 54.67 % change on previous year | -1384.7% |
| 1988 | 23.56 % change on previous year | -56.9% |
| 1989 | 3.37 % change on previous year | -85.7% |
| 1990 | 58.04 % change on previous year | +1621.3% |
| 1991 | 37.72 % change on previous year | -35.0% |
| 1992 | -15.81 % change on previous year | -141.9% |
| 1993 | -15.53 % change on previous year | -1.8% |
| 1994 | 15.33 % change on previous year | -198.7% |
| 1995 | -31.13 % change on previous year | -303.0% |
| 1996 | -23.7 % change on previous year | -23.9% |
| 1997 | 1.68 % change on previous year | -107.1% |
| 1998 | -34.08 % change on previous year | -2130.2% |
| 1999 | -87.48 % change on previous year | +156.7% |
| 2000 | -17.14 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 2001 | 587.93 % change on previous year | -3529.6% |
| 2002 | -16.54 % change on previous year | -102.8% |
| 2003 | -61.26 % change on previous year | +270.4% |
| 2004 | 4.65 % change on previous year | -107.6% |
| 2005 | -42.22 % change on previous year | -1007.8% |
| 2006 | -87.18 % change on previous year | +106.5% |
| 2007 | -40 % change on previous year | -54.1% |
| 2008 | 216.67 % change on previous year | -641.7% |
| 2009 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -97.6% |
| 2010 | 40 % change on previous year | +660.0% |
| 2011 | -53.57 % change on previous year | -233.9% |
| 2012 | -82.81 % change on previous year | +54.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 180.56 % change on previous year | 30.36 % change on previous year | 330.77 % change on previous year | 2 |
| 1970s | 68.45 % change on previous year | -70.39 % change on previous year | 508.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.19 % change on previous year | -27.26 % change on previous year | 98.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -9.49 % change on previous year | -87.48 % change on previous year | 58.04 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 55.02 % change on previous year | -87.18 % change on previous year | 587.93 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -32.13 % change on previous year | -82.81 % change on previous year | 40 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 127 Kosovo -79.67 % change on previous year
- 128 Comoros -80 % change on previous year compare
- 129 Nicaragua -81.93 % change on previous year compare
- 131 Malawi -82.96 % change on previous year compare
- 132 Ecuador -84.65 % change on previous year compare
- 133 Solomon Islands -85.71 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Chile was -82.81 % change on previous year in 2012, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 587.93 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -87.48 % change on previous year in 1999.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Chile ranks 130th out of 156 countries with data for 2012.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 400.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 45 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.