Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) was 0.378 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean recorded 0.378 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 17.9% on the previous year and down 90.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 38th of 44 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2391 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4443 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.8% |
| 1963 | 0.7123 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 1964 | 0.6824 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1965 | 0.7382 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.4% |
| 1968 | 0.7248 current US$ per square kilometre | +826.8% |
| 1969 | 0.8558 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1970 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.8% |
| 1971 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1972 | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 1973 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1974 | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.2% |
| 1975 | 4.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1976 | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.1% |
| 1977 | 8.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1978 | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1979 | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 1980 | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1981 | 13.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1982 | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 1984 | 8.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1985 | 8.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1986 | 9.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1987 | 11.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1988 | 12.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1989 | 15.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 1990 | 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1991 | 13.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 1992 | 20.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 1993 | 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1994 | 14.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1995 | 23.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.6% |
| 1996 | 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1997 | 21.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 1998 | 21.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1999 | 13.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.5% |
| 2000 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 2001 | 13.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.3% |
| 2002 | 10.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2003 | 9.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2004 | 14.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2005 | 12.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2006 | 8.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 2007 | 13.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 2008 | 11.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2009 | 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2010 | 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2011 | 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2012 | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.3% |
| 2013 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2014 | 1.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.0% |
| 2015 | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 2016 | 0.5102 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 2017 | 0.298 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.6% |
| 2018 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +373.9% |
| 2019 | 0.656 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 2020 | 0.5638 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2021 | 0.558 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2022 | 0.3207 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.5% |
| 2023 | 0.378 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5594 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8558 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 11.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.298 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4551 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3207 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5638 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 35 Pakistan 35.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Suriname 33.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Bulgaria 32.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Singapore 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Czechia 28.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Somalia 25.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Guinea 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean was 0.378 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$)?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 38th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, netherlands (current us$) rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is down 90.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.