Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was -0.0035 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Chile, 1967–2016
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded -0.0035 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in 2016.
That represents a change of down 101.3% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 47.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, -16 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2011.
Chile ranks 137th of 142 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0538 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0538 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1985 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +1950.0% |
| 1986 | 0.8877 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1987 | 0.4707 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.0% |
| 1988 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.9% |
| 1989 | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.9% |
| 1990 | 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.5% |
| 1991 | 12.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.2% |
| 1992 | 12.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1993 | 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.3% |
| 1994 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1995 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.5% |
| 1996 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1997 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1998 | 1.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.807 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 2000 | 0.8742 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2001 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2002 | 0.6321 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 2003 | 0.8608 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 2004 | 0.3228 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 2005 | 21.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +6475.0% |
| 2006 | 19.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2007 | 31 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.0% |
| 2008 | 47.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.8% |
| 2009 | 17.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.0% |
| 2010 | 17.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2011 | -16 current US$ per square kilometre | -191.0% |
| 2012 | 43.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -371.9% |
| 2013 | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
| 2014 | 0.2621 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.0% |
| 2016 | -0.0035 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0269 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 0.0323 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0538 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1990s | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.807 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3228 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -16 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 134 Uzbekistan 0.0378 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Namibia 0.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Kazakhstan 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 138 Turkmenistan -0.0347 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Kyrgyzstan -0.2909 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 Serbia -4.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in Chile was -0.0035 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 47.06 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -16 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 137th out of 142 countries with data for 2016.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.