Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per was 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 76.4%
Rank
43rd
of 44 groups
All-time high
1.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1976
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in High income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in High income is 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 76.4% on the previous year and down 94.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in High income peaked at 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
That places High income 43rd out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0142 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0102 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0179 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1965 | 0.0154 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0139 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0091 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1968 | 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0034 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1970 | 0.006 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0023 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1973 | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0085 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0014 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.3% |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1977 | 0.004 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0.0108 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.4% |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0034 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0199 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0194 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1984 | 0.047 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0635 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0584 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1987 | 0.0504 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1988 | 0.0586 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0959 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 1990 | 0.1919 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1991 | 0.3604 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.8% |
| 1992 | 0.1922 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.7% |
| 1993 | 0.0644 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.5% |
| 1994 | 0.1565 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.1% |
| 1995 | 0.1338 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1996 | 0.1496 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1997 | 0.2653 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.3% |
| 1998 | 0.2936 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1999 | 0.0939 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.0% |
| 2000 | 0.1676 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.4% |
| 2001 | 0.3703 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.0% |
| 2002 | 0.274 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2003 | 0.2874 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2004 | 0.3807 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 2005 | 0.7018 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.3% |
| 2006 | 0.5637 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2007 | 0.6157 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2008 | 0.7637 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 2009 | 0.3416 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.3% |
| 2010 | 0.9378 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.5% |
| 2011 | 0.703 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2012 | 0.6598 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2013 | 0.3522 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.6% |
| 2014 | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +410.2% |
| 2015 | 0.1103 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.9% |
| 2016 | 0.071 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0831 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0665 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2019 | 0.9179 current US$ per square kilometre | +1279.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0564 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0819 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0899 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2023 | 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0034 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0179 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0038 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0108 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0417 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0959 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1902 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0644 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3604 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4467 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1676 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7637 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5699 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0665 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0623 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0899 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 40 Sudan 26.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Gambia 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Kenya 25.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Seychelles 21.74 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Mali 20.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Burkina Faso 20.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Bosnia and Herzegovina 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per in High income was 0.0212 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
- High income ranks 43rd out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 94.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.