Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA blend

IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -16.98 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2022)
-16.98 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 225.1%
Rank
31st
of 46 groups
All-time high
73.84 % change on previous year
in 1987
All-time low
-39.37 % change on previous year
in 1999
Years of data
52
1971–2022

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA blend, 1971–2022

-50-250255075197119962022

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA blend stood at -16.98 % change on previous year.

The figure is down 225.1% on the previous year and down 218.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA blend peaked at 73.84 % change on previous year in 1987 and was at its lowest, -39.37 % change on previous year, in 1999.

That places IDA blend 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA blend, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate in IDA blend, 1971 to 2022.
Year % change on previous year Change
1971 -7.39 % change on previous year
1972 -30.36 % change on previous year +310.8%
1973 43.26 % change on previous year -242.5%
1974 38.98 % change on previous year -9.9%
1975 35.33 % change on previous year -9.4%
1976 8.34 % change on previous year -76.4%
1977 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1978 16.36 % change on previous year
1979 35.63 % change on previous year +117.8%
1980 48.88 % change on previous year +37.2%
1981 -28.29 % change on previous year -157.9%
1982 -2.6 % change on previous year -90.8%
1983 -8.73 % change on previous year +235.0%
1984 3.83 % change on previous year -143.9%
1985 26.81 % change on previous year +600.0%
1986 -18.97 % change on previous year -170.8%
1987 73.84 % change on previous year -489.2%
1988 -8.65 % change on previous year -111.7%
1989 7.19 % change on previous year -183.2%
1990 11.36 % change on previous year +58.0%
1991 0.5083 % change on previous year -95.5%
1992 34.52 % change on previous year +6690.5%
1993 -33.55 % change on previous year -197.2%
1994 -8.29 % change on previous year -75.3%
1995 11.6 % change on previous year -239.9%
1996 0.8845 % change on previous year -92.4%
1997 -36.77 % change on previous year -4257.0%
1998 25.09 % change on previous year -168.2%
1999 -39.37 % change on previous year -256.9%
2000 10.25 % change on previous year -126.0%
2001 -28.03 % change on previous year -373.4%
2002 15.51 % change on previous year -155.3%
2003 63.91 % change on previous year +312.0%
2004 33.78 % change on previous year -47.1%
2005 16.3 % change on previous year -51.8%
2006 24.35 % change on previous year +49.4%
2007 62.32 % change on previous year +155.9%
2008 -33.19 % change on previous year -153.3%
2009 6.83 % change on previous year -120.6%
2010 8.8 % change on previous year +28.9%
2011 12.78 % change on previous year +45.2%
2012 -5.34 % change on previous year -141.7%
2013 -1.23 % change on previous year -77.0%
2014 -1.01 % change on previous year -18.0%
2015 -15.61 % change on previous year +1453.1%
2016 5.06 % change on previous year -132.4%
2017 17.75 % change on previous year +250.6%
2018 -0.8155 % change on previous year -104.6%
2019 -5.48 % change on previous year +572.1%
2020 4.66 % change on previous year -185.1%
2021 13.57 % change on previous year +191.0%
2022 -16.98 % change on previous year -225.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 15.57 % change on previous year -30.36 % change on previous year 43.26 % change on previous year 9
1980s 9.33 % change on previous year -28.29 % change on previous year 73.84 % change on previous year 10
1990s -3.4 % change on previous year -39.37 % change on previous year 34.52 % change on previous year 10
2000s 17.2 % change on previous year -33.19 % change on previous year 63.91 % change on previous year 10
2010s 1.49 % change on previous year -15.61 % change on previous year 17.75 % change on previous year 10
2020s 0.4167 % change on previous year -16.98 % change on previous year 13.57 % change on previous year 3

Countries ranked near IDA blend

  1. 28 Senegal 36.76 % change on previous year compare
  2. 29 Romania 32.05 % change on previous year compare
  3. 30 Sudan 31.85 % change on previous year compare
  4. 31 Cape Verde 31.64 % change on previous year compare
  5. 32 Nepal 31.54 % change on previous year compare
  6. 33 Mexico 29.62 % change on previous year compare
  7. 34 Belize 29.49 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 182 places →

More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend

All data for IDA blend →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA blend?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in IDA blend was -16.98 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
The highest recorded value was 73.84 % change on previous year in 1987.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in IDA blend?
The lowest recorded value was -39.37 % change on previous year in 1999.
How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
IDA blend ranks 31st out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in IDA blend?
Over the last ten years it is down 218.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this IDA blend data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA blend. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-sweden-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ida-blend/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in IDA blend</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 6,670 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.