Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IDA only
IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 1.12 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IDA only, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
IDA only recorded 1.12 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in 2022.
That represents a change of down 23.3% on the previous year and up 11.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IDA only peaked at 1.46 billion current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 16.16 million current US$, in 1970.
IDA only ranks 5th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in IDA only, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 16.16 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 21.63 million current US$ | +33.8% |
| 1972 | 56.99 million current US$ | +163.5% |
| 1973 | 61.46 million current US$ | +7.8% |
| 1974 | 74.59 million current US$ | +21.4% |
| 1975 | 145.07 million current US$ | +94.5% |
| 1976 | 135.63 million current US$ | -6.5% |
| 1977 | 187.93 million current US$ | +38.6% |
| 1978 | 189.73 million current US$ | +1.0% |
| 1979 | 309.71 million current US$ | +63.2% |
| 1980 | 285.10 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 1981 | 251.07 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 1982 | 259.78 million current US$ | +3.5% |
| 1983 | 237.15 million current US$ | -8.7% |
| 1984 | 207.00 million current US$ | -12.7% |
| 1985 | 221.35 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 1986 | 355.58 million current US$ | +60.6% |
| 1987 | 330.13 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 1988 | 449.72 million current US$ | +36.2% |
| 1989 | 435.87 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 1990 | 527.21 million current US$ | +21.0% |
| 1991 | 656.27 million current US$ | +24.5% |
| 1992 | 563.74 million current US$ | -14.1% |
| 1993 | 459.86 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 1994 | 381.73 million current US$ | -17.0% |
| 1995 | 374.51 million current US$ | -1.9% |
| 1996 | 440.25 million current US$ | +17.6% |
| 1997 | 377.19 million current US$ | -14.3% |
| 1998 | 308.57 million current US$ | -18.2% |
| 1999 | 349.27 million current US$ | +13.2% |
| 2000 | 417.81 million current US$ | +19.6% |
| 2001 | 386.35 million current US$ | -7.5% |
| 2002 | 395.94 million current US$ | +2.5% |
| 2003 | 658.92 million current US$ | +66.4% |
| 2004 | 663.18 million current US$ | +0.6% |
| 2005 | 775.28 million current US$ | +16.9% |
| 2006 | 822.41 million current US$ | +6.1% |
| 2007 | 849.88 million current US$ | +3.3% |
| 2008 | 986.30 million current US$ | +16.1% |
| 2009 | 891.07 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 2010 | 888.80 million current US$ | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 1.25 billion current US$ | +40.7% |
| 2012 | 1.00 billion current US$ | -19.9% |
| 2013 | 1.15 billion current US$ | +14.7% |
| 2014 | 1.07 billion current US$ | -7.1% |
| 2015 | 898.55 million current US$ | -15.8% |
| 2016 | 903.94 million current US$ | +0.6% |
| 2017 | 1.10 billion current US$ | +22.0% |
| 2018 | 1.27 billion current US$ | +15.3% |
| 2019 | 1.17 billion current US$ | -8.1% |
| 2020 | 1.19 billion current US$ | +1.9% |
| 2021 | 1.46 billion current US$ | +22.3% |
| 2022 | 1.12 billion current US$ | -23.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 119.89 million current US$ | 16.16 million current US$ | 309.71 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 303.27 million current US$ | 207.00 million current US$ | 449.72 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 443.86 million current US$ | 308.57 million current US$ | 656.27 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 684.71 million current US$ | 386.35 million current US$ | 986.30 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.07 billion current US$ | 888.80 million current US$ | 1.27 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.26 billion current US$ | 1.12 billion current US$ | 1.46 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA only
- 2 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 91.43 million current US$ compare
- 3 Afghanistan 85.53 million current US$ compare
- 4 Ethiopia 77.41 million current US$ compare
- 5 Mozambique 76.52 million current US$ compare
- 6 Somalia 73.80 million current US$ compare
- 7 Russian Federation 69.65 million current US$ compare
- 8 Sudan 59.98 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA only
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 117.31 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 435.75 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 4.52 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 800.21 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.09 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.61 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.59 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 421.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.87 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IDA only?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in IDA only was 1.12 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in IDA only?
- The highest recorded value was 1.46 billion current US$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in IDA only?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.16 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does IDA only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- IDA only ranks 5th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in IDA only?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA only data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.