Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries
Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 1.03 billion current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Least developed countries recorded 1.03 billion current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in 2022.
That represents a change of down 23.3% on the previous year and up 8.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries peaked at 1.35 billion current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, 16.13 million current US$, in 1970.
That places Least developed countries 8th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in Least developed countries, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 16.13 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 19.89 million current US$ | +23.3% |
| 1972 | 56.21 million current US$ | +182.6% |
| 1973 | 58.10 million current US$ | +3.4% |
| 1974 | 70.64 million current US$ | +21.6% |
| 1975 | 136.89 million current US$ | +93.8% |
| 1976 | 131.30 million current US$ | -4.1% |
| 1977 | 177.90 million current US$ | +35.5% |
| 1978 | 189.62 million current US$ | +6.6% |
| 1979 | 284.64 million current US$ | +50.1% |
| 1980 | 271.29 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 1981 | 245.37 million current US$ | -9.6% |
| 1982 | 240.42 million current US$ | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 210.76 million current US$ | -12.3% |
| 1984 | 175.58 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1985 | 194.19 million current US$ | +10.6% |
| 1986 | 328.91 million current US$ | +69.4% |
| 1987 | 308.36 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1988 | 431.96 million current US$ | +40.1% |
| 1989 | 393.51 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 1990 | 521.29 million current US$ | +32.5% |
| 1991 | 610.04 million current US$ | +17.0% |
| 1992 | 516.95 million current US$ | -15.3% |
| 1993 | 423.58 million current US$ | -18.1% |
| 1994 | 370.19 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 1995 | 351.53 million current US$ | -5.0% |
| 1996 | 405.50 million current US$ | +15.4% |
| 1997 | 361.23 million current US$ | -10.9% |
| 1998 | 293.70 million current US$ | -18.7% |
| 1999 | 289.60 million current US$ | -1.4% |
| 2000 | 337.31 million current US$ | +16.5% |
| 2001 | 325.66 million current US$ | -3.5% |
| 2002 | 344.66 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 2003 | 608.67 million current US$ | +76.6% |
| 2004 | 586.64 million current US$ | -3.6% |
| 2005 | 638.57 million current US$ | +8.9% |
| 2006 | 728.59 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2007 | 748.50 million current US$ | +2.7% |
| 2008 | 902.69 million current US$ | +20.6% |
| 2009 | 807.73 million current US$ | -10.5% |
| 2010 | 828.75 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 2011 | 1.20 billion current US$ | +45.3% |
| 2012 | 951.78 million current US$ | -20.9% |
| 2013 | 1.07 billion current US$ | +12.5% |
| 2014 | 984.78 million current US$ | -8.1% |
| 2015 | 846.96 million current US$ | -14.0% |
| 2016 | 837.52 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 1.02 billion current US$ | +22.1% |
| 2018 | 1.17 billion current US$ | +14.8% |
| 2019 | 1.08 billion current US$ | -8.2% |
| 2020 | 1.11 billion current US$ | +3.1% |
| 2021 | 1.35 billion current US$ | +21.1% |
| 2022 | 1.03 billion current US$ | -23.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 114.13 million current US$ | 16.13 million current US$ | 284.64 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 280.04 million current US$ | 175.58 million current US$ | 431.96 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 414.36 million current US$ | 289.60 million current US$ | 610.04 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 602.90 million current US$ | 325.66 million current US$ | 902.69 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.00 billion current US$ | 828.75 million current US$ | 1.20 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.16 billion current US$ | 1.03 billion current US$ | 1.35 billion current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Least developed countries
- 5 Mozambique 76.52 million current US$ compare
- 6 Somalia 73.80 million current US$ compare
- 7 Russian Federation 69.65 million current US$ compare
- 8 Sudan 59.98 million current US$ compare
- 9 Tanzania, United Republic of 55.91 million current US$ compare
- 10 Syrian Arab Republic 52.92 million current US$ compare
- 11 Republic of Moldova 49.29 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Least developed countries
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 92.13 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 410.90 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.35 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.75 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 649.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.12 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.96 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.48 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 381.23 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.39 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in Least developed countries was 1.03 billion current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
- The highest recorded value was 1.35 billion current US$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in Least developed countries?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.13 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Least developed countries rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- Least developed countries ranks 8th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Least developed countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.