Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.84 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.7%
Rank
38th
of 46 groups
All-time high
10.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) recorded 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 5.7% on the previous year and down 41.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 10.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0389 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0446 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0383 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0214 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.3% |
| 1967 | 0.0163 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0415 current US$ per square kilometre | +153.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0314 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1970 | 0.4742 current US$ per square kilometre | +1410.0% |
| 1971 | 0.319 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1972 | 0.314 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1973 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +370.8% |
| 1974 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1975 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.2% |
| 1976 | 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.9% |
| 1977 | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1978 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1979 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1980 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1981 | 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1982 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1983 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1984 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1985 | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1986 | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 1987 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1988 | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 1989 | 5.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 7.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 1991 | 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1992 | 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1993 | 8.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1994 | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1995 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1996 | 8.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.4% |
| 1997 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1998 | 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1999 | 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2000 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2001 | 5.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 5 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2003 | 6.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2004 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 2005 | 9.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2006 | 10.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2007 | 10.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2008 | 10.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2010 | 7.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2011 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2013 | 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2014 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2015 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 2016 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2017 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2018 | 6.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2019 | 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2020 | 5.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2021 | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 2022 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 2023 | 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.029 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0446 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.314 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 35 Ethiopia 68.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Malawi 66.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Tanzania, United Republic of 63.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 61.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Myanmar 59.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Iraq 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 10.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.