Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 71.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2017)
71.28 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 67.9%
World rank
160th
of 178 countries
All-time high
311.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
-46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1979
Years of data
57
1961–2017
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Chile, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Chile stood at 71.28 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 67.9% on the previous year and down 44.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Chile peaked at 311.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, -46 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1979.
Chile ranks 160th of 178 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 166.64 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 177.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1963 | 173.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1964 | 144.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1965 | 135.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1966 | 155.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1967 | 113.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 1968 | 98.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1969 | 96.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1970 | 69.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1971 | 27.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.3% |
| 1972 | 44.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.3% |
| 1973 | 47.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1974 | 13.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.3% |
| 1975 | 143.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +958.5% |
| 1976 | 7.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.9% |
| 1977 | 8.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1978 | -0.7666 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.4% |
| 1979 | -46 current US$ per square kilometre | +5900.0% |
| 1980 | -17.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.3% |
| 1981 | -6.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.9% |
| 1982 | -5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1983 | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -262.0% |
| 1984 | 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.8% |
| 1985 | 62.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +380.9% |
| 1986 | 0.5783 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.1% |
| 1987 | 34.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +5881.4% |
| 1988 | 65.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.5% |
| 1989 | 86.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1990 | 139.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.0% |
| 1991 | 158.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1992 | 176.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1993 | 237.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1994 | 200.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1995 | 208.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1996 | 259.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1997 | 168.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1998 | 136.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1999 | 91.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 2000 | 62.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2001 | 63.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2002 | -8.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -114.0% |
| 2003 | 96.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -1182.4% |
| 2004 | 53.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.2% |
| 2005 | 154.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +191.9% |
| 2006 | 122.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.8% |
| 2007 | 127.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2008 | 126.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2009 | 95.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 2010 | 233.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.3% |
| 2011 | 205.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.2% |
| 2012 | 151.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 2013 | 87.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 2014 | 311.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +255.6% |
| 2015 | 52.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.1% |
| 2016 | 222.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +322.3% |
| 2017 | 71.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 140.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 96.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 177.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 31.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -46 current US$ per square kilometre | 143.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 24.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 177.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 91.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 259.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 89.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 154.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 167.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 52.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 311.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 157 Russian Federation 76.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 Thailand 73.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Singapore 72.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 British Virgin Islands 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 Hong Kong, China 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Oman 24.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Chile was 71.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 311.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -46 current US$ per square kilometre in 1979.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Chile ranks 160th out of 178 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.