Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Chile
Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was -68.79 % change on previous year in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Chile, 1963–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Chile recorded -68.79 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 349.0% on the previous year and down 74.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Chile peaked at 750 % change on previous year in 1973 and was at its lowest, -966.67 % change on previous year, in 1968.
Chile ranks 127th of 169 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | -81.36 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 71.76 % change on previous year | -188.2% |
| 1965 | 80.14 % change on previous year | +11.7% |
| 1966 | 41.44 % change on previous year | -48.3% |
| 1967 | -97.58 % change on previous year | -335.4% |
| 1968 | -966.67 % change on previous year | +890.6% |
| 1969 | 64.1 % change on previous year | -106.6% |
| 1970 | -307.14 % change on previous year | -579.1% |
| 1971 | 8.77 % change on previous year | -102.9% |
| 1972 | 109.61 % change on previous year | +1149.6% |
| 1973 | 750 % change on previous year | +584.2% |
| 1974 | 47.06 % change on previous year | -93.7% |
| 1975 | -52 % change on previous year | -210.5% |
| 1976 | 100 % change on previous year | -292.3% |
| 1977 | 154.17 % change on previous year | +54.2% |
| 1978 | -47.87 % change on previous year | -131.1% |
| 1979 | 138.37 % change on previous year | -389.0% |
| 1980 | 15.57 % change on previous year | -88.7% |
| 1981 | -37.67 % change on previous year | -342.0% |
| 1982 | -59.34 % change on previous year | +57.5% |
| 1983 | -45.05 % change on previous year | -24.1% |
| 1984 | -44.26 % change on previous year | -1.7% |
| 1985 | 26.47 % change on previous year | -159.8% |
| 1986 | 27.91 % change on previous year | +5.4% |
| 1987 | -21.82 % change on previous year | -178.2% |
| 1988 | 25.58 % change on previous year | -217.2% |
| 1989 | -18.52 % change on previous year | -172.4% |
| 1990 | 52.27 % change on previous year | -382.3% |
| 1991 | 58.21 % change on previous year | +11.4% |
| 1992 | 50 % change on previous year | -14.1% |
| 1993 | -11.32 % change on previous year | -122.6% |
| 1994 | 60.99 % change on previous year | -638.8% |
| 1995 | 33.04 % change on previous year | -45.8% |
| 1996 | -2.32 % change on previous year | -107.0% |
| 1997 | -19.66 % change on previous year | +748.2% |
| 1998 | -29.54 % change on previous year | +50.2% |
| 1999 | -30.54 % change on previous year | +3.4% |
| 2000 | -87.07 % change on previous year | +185.1% |
| 2003 | 44.83 % change on previous year | -151.5% |
| 2004 | 152.38 % change on previous year | +239.9% |
| 2005 | -0.9434 % change on previous year | -100.6% |
| 2006 | -18.1 % change on previous year | +1818.1% |
| 2007 | -39.53 % change on previous year | +118.5% |
| 2008 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -80.5% |
| 2009 | 22.92 % change on previous year | -397.9% |
| 2010 | 11.86 % change on previous year | -48.2% |
| 2011 | -16.67 % change on previous year | -240.5% |
| 2012 | 154.54 % change on previous year | -1027.3% |
| 2013 | 120.38 % change on previous year | -22.1% |
| 2014 | -15.22 % change on previous year | -112.6% |
| 2015 | 171.78 % change on previous year | -1228.8% |
| 2016 | 27.63 % change on previous year | -83.9% |
| 2017 | -68.79 % change on previous year | -349.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -126.88 % change on previous year | -966.67 % change on previous year | 80.14 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1970s | 90.1 % change on previous year | -307.14 % change on previous year | 750 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -13.11 % change on previous year | -59.34 % change on previous year | 27.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.11 % change on previous year | -30.54 % change on previous year | 60.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.35 % change on previous year | -87.07 % change on previous year | 152.38 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 2010s | 48.19 % change on previous year | -68.79 % change on previous year | 171.78 % change on previous year | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 124 Panama -67.12 % change on previous year compare
- 125 Afghanistan -67.13 % change on previous year compare
- 126 Kiribati -68.31 % change on previous year compare
- 128 Hungary -69.83 % change on previous year compare
- 129 Tajikistan -70.85 % change on previous year compare
- 130 Guinea -71.13 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Chile
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 399,452 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 198,376 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 5.12 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 213,829 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.63 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.83 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,400 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 2.79 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Chile?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Chile was -68.79 % change on previous year in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 750 % change on previous year in 1973.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -966.67 % change on previous year in 1968.
- How does Chile rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Chile ranks 127th out of 169 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.