Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.4 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 46.6%
World rank
121st
of 168 countries
All-time high
47.46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1997
All-time low
-59.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Years of data
58
1966–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Ecuador, 1966–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Ecuador stood at 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 46.6% on the previous year and down 12.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Ecuador peaked at 47.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, -59.47 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2004.
Ecuador ranks 121st of 168 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1966 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1968 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1969 | 0.7947 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.7% |
| 1970 | 0.903 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1971 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 1972 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1973 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.3% |
| 1974 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1975 | 9.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1976 | 31.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +240.2% |
| 1977 | 11.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.6% |
| 1978 | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1979 | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 1980 | 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 1981 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1982 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1983 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1984 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1985 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1986 | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1987 | 11.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +196.2% |
| 1988 | 7.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 1989 | 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1990 | 8.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1991 | 8.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1992 | 9.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1993 | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 1994 | 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.1% |
| 1995 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 1996 | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.8% |
| 1997 | 47.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +379.6% |
| 1998 | 15.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.1% |
| 1999 | 46.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +209.3% |
| 2000 | 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.2% |
| 2001 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2002 | 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 2003 | 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 2004 | -59.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -3702.4% |
| 2005 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.1% |
| 2006 | -7.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -735.5% |
| 2007 | -5.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2008 | -2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.6% |
| 2009 | -0.6442 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.9% |
| 2010 | -0.1208 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.3% |
| 2011 | 0.8858 current US$ per square kilometre | -833.3% |
| 2012 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.5% |
| 2013 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2014 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2015 | 1.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2016 | 0.502 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.1% |
| 2017 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +199.3% |
| 2018 | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 2019 | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.0% |
| 2020 | 6.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2021 | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2022 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2023 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7947 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1970s | 9.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.903 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1208 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 118 Guinea-Bissau 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Republic of Korea 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 120 Papua New Guinea 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Russian Federation 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Uruguay 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Brunei Darussalam 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Ecuador was 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 47.46 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -59.47 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Ecuador ranks 121st out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.