Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ▼ Falling
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Russian Federation, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Russian Federation is 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2004.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Russian Federation peaked at 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
That places Russian Federation 122nd out of 168 countries with data for 2004, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 1994 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.6% |
| 1995 | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.7% |
| 1996 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1997 | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1998 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2000 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2001 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2002 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2003 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2004 | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 119 Republic of Korea 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre
- 120 Papua New Guinea 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 121 Ecuador 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Uruguay 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 124 Brunei Darussalam 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre
- 125 Poland 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 22.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 90,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.20 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 160.07 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 12.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 98.31 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.89 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.82 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Russian Federation?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Russian Federation was 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Russian Federation rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Russian Federation ranks 122nd out of 168 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.