Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
9.73 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 28.3%
Rank
36th
of 45 groups
All-time high
25.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
All-time low
-28.44 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean is 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.3% on the previous year and down 46.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 25.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, -28.44 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 36th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.9913 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 1963 | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1964 | 0.6366 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 1965 | 0.2182 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 1966 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +360.7% |
| 1967 | 0.4667 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 1968 | 0.6824 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 1969 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.4% |
| 1970 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 1971 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.2% |
| 1972 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1973 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1974 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1975 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1976 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1977 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1978 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.5% |
| 1979 | 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1980 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1981 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1982 | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.2% |
| 1983 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 1984 | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1985 | 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1986 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1987 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1988 | 5.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1989 | 6.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1990 | 6.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1991 | 6.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1992 | 5.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1993 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1994 | 6.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1995 | 7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1996 | 5.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 1997 | 14.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +149.0% |
| 1998 | 10.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.0% |
| 1999 | 15.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 2000 | 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2001 | 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2002 | 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.2% |
| 2003 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.4% |
| 2004 | 7.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2005 | 7.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.3% |
| 2007 | -28.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -1379.7% |
| 2008 | 7.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.7% |
| 2009 | 7.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2011 | 12.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.0% |
| 2012 | 21.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.1% |
| 2013 | 18.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2014 | 12.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.1% |
| 2015 | 16.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2016 | 20.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 2017 | 25.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2018 | 25.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 17.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 2020 | 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2021 | 15.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2022 | 13.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2023 | 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8622 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2182 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 33 Somalia 193.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Ethiopia 190.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Barbados 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 North Macedonia 183.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Uganda 157.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Sri Lanka 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean was 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 25.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was -28.44 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 36th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.