Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 33.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
33.75 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.5%
World rank
60th
of 168 countries
All-time high
380.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
All-time low
1.22 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zambia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Zambia recorded 33.75 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
The figure is up 4.5% on the previous year and down 73.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zambia peaked at 380.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zambia 60th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +546.2% |
| 1963 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1964 | 27.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +282.9% |
| 1965 | 16.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.3% |
| 1966 | 35.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.6% |
| 1967 | 53.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1968 | 18.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.4% |
| 1969 | 17.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1970 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.3% |
| 1971 | 17.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.1% |
| 1972 | 13.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1973 | 17.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1974 | 25.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1975 | 28.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1976 | 22.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 1977 | 25.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1978 | 33.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 1979 | 80.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.4% |
| 1980 | 58 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 1981 | 51 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1982 | 28.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.2% |
| 1983 | 27.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1984 | 26.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1985 | 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1986 | 59.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.9% |
| 1987 | 51.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1988 | 39.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1989 | 41.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 57.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1991 | 89.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 1992 | 133.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.8% |
| 1993 | 54.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.3% |
| 1994 | 92.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.2% |
| 1995 | 102.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1996 | 81.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1997 | 126.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1998 | 44.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 1999 | 85.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.3% |
| 2000 | 149.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.2% |
| 2001 | 75.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2002 | 37.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.6% |
| 2003 | 88.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.2% |
| 2004 | 380.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +328.8% |
| 2005 | 222.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.3% |
| 2006 | 116.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 2007 | 99.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2008 | 82.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2009 | 98.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2010 | 106.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2011 | 124.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2012 | 113.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2013 | 125.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2014 | 201.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.2% |
| 2015 | 103.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 2016 | 105.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 91.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2018 | 50.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 2019 | 87.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 2020 | 70.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 2021 | 51.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.8% |
| 2022 | 32.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 2023 | 33.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 27.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 80.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 41.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 86.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 133.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 135.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 380.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 111.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 201.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 47.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 70.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 57 Vanuatu 40.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Romania 37.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 59 Samoa 34.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 61 Azerbaijan 33.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 62 Sudan 31.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 63 Viet Nam 30.63 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Zambia was 33.75 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 380.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Zambia ranks 60th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 73.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.