Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central
Africa Western and Central: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square was 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central, 1980–2019
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Africa Western and Central recorded 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in 2019. That is the highest value across all 40 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 19.0% on the previous year and up 326.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central peaked at 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0818 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
Africa Western and Central ranks 14th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.0818 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.4068 current US$ per square kilometre | +397.3% |
| 1982 | 0.912 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.2% |
| 1983 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1984 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.6% |
| 1985 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.0% |
| 1986 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1987 | 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 1988 | 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.3% |
| 1989 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1990 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.8% |
| 1991 | 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.2% |
| 1992 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1994 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1995 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.2% |
| 1996 | 4 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1997 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.0% |
| 1998 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1999 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2000 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 2001 | 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 2002 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 3.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.6% |
| 2004 | 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.8% |
| 2005 | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2006 | 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2007 | 7.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.5% |
| 2008 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2009 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 2010 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 5.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.4% |
| 2012 | 11.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.2% |
| 2013 | 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2014 | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2015 | 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 2016 | 9.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2017 | 12.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 2018 | 12.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2019 | 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0818 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central
- 11 Malawi 340.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Guinea-Bissau 185.14 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Haiti 174.16 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Djibouti 168.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Bangladesh 161.23 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Liberia 139.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Benin 132.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 16.65 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 125.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.97 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.72 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 216.58 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.07 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.82 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 592.48 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 88.12 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 363.44 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central was 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The highest recorded value was 15.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0818 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Africa Western and Central rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
- Africa Western and Central ranks 14th out of 45 groups with data for 2019.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
- Over the last ten years it is up 326.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.