Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled in Zambia
Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled was 1.50 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled in Zambia, 1969–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled in Zambia stood at 1.50 million current US$.
That represents a change of down 77.5% on the previous year and down 34.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled in Zambia peaked at 16.06 million current US$ in 2002 and was at its lowest, 180,000 current US$, in 1970.
That places Zambia 63rd out of 129 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 310,000 current US$ | — |
| 1970 | 180,000 current US$ | -41.9% |
| 1971 | 350,000 current US$ | +94.4% |
| 1972 | 510,000 current US$ | +45.7% |
| 1973 | 780,000 current US$ | +52.9% |
| 1974 | 540,000 current US$ | -30.8% |
| 1975 | 540,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 690,000 current US$ | +27.8% |
| 1977 | 1.40 million current US$ | +102.9% |
| 1978 | 2.07 million current US$ | +47.9% |
| 1979 | 5.86 million current US$ | +183.1% |
| 1980 | 2.82 million current US$ | -51.9% |
| 1981 | 2.75 million current US$ | -2.5% |
| 1982 | 3.10 million current US$ | +12.7% |
| 1983 | 2.58 million current US$ | -16.8% |
| 1984 | 3.17 million current US$ | +22.9% |
| 1985 | 1.93 million current US$ | -39.1% |
| 1986 | 2.82 million current US$ | +46.1% |
| 1987 | 3.56 million current US$ | +26.2% |
| 1988 | 3.99 million current US$ | +12.1% |
| 1989 | 4.11 million current US$ | +3.0% |
| 1990 | 3.45 million current US$ | -16.1% |
| 1991 | 1.92 million current US$ | -44.3% |
| 1992 | 3.71 million current US$ | +93.2% |
| 1993 | 3.24 million current US$ | -12.7% |
| 1994 | 4.91 million current US$ | +51.5% |
| 1995 | 2.09 million current US$ | -57.4% |
| 1996 | 2.29 million current US$ | +9.6% |
| 1997 | 2.83 million current US$ | +23.6% |
| 1998 | 2.80 million current US$ | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 3.27 million current US$ | +16.8% |
| 2000 | 8.64 million current US$ | +164.2% |
| 2001 | 11.68 million current US$ | +35.2% |
| 2002 | 16.06 million current US$ | +37.5% |
| 2003 | 11.16 million current US$ | -30.5% |
| 2004 | 10.41 million current US$ | -6.7% |
| 2005 | 2.22 million current US$ | -78.7% |
| 2006 | 1.82 million current US$ | -18.0% |
| 2007 | 2.58 million current US$ | +41.8% |
| 2008 | 3.12 million current US$ | +20.9% |
| 2009 | 3.70 million current US$ | +18.6% |
| 2010 | 2.39 million current US$ | -35.4% |
| 2011 | 8.34 million current US$ | +249.0% |
| 2012 | 6.95 million current US$ | -16.6% |
| 2013 | 2.29 million current US$ | -67.1% |
| 2014 | 2.47 million current US$ | +7.8% |
| 2015 | 2.65 million current US$ | +7.3% |
| 2016 | 4.20 million current US$ | +58.5% |
| 2017 | 7.66 million current US$ | +82.3% |
| 2018 | 4.08 million current US$ | -46.7% |
| 2019 | 5.94 million current US$ | +45.5% |
| 2020 | 5.63 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2021 | 6.18 million current US$ | +9.8% |
| 2022 | 6.68 million current US$ | +8.2% |
| 2023 | 1.50 million current US$ | -77.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 310,000 current US$ | 310,000 current US$ | 310,000 current US$ | 1 |
| 1970s | 1.29 million current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 5.86 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.08 million current US$ | 1.93 million current US$ | 4.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.05 million current US$ | 1.92 million current US$ | 4.91 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.14 million current US$ | 1.82 million current US$ | 16.06 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.70 million current US$ | 2.29 million current US$ | 8.34 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.00 million current US$ | 1.50 million current US$ | 6.68 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled in Zambia?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled in Zambia was 1.50 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 16.06 million current US$ in 2002.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 180,000 current US$ in 1970.
- How does Zambia rank for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled?
- Zambia ranks 63rd out of 129 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.