Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per was 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.55 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 25.4%
Rank
30th
of 44 groups
All-time high
23.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1989
All-time low
-23.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in South Asia is 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.4% on the previous year and up 103.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in South Asia peaked at 23.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989 and was at its lowest, -23.97 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2004.
South Asia ranks 30th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.73 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -252.7% |
| 1963 | 0.2086 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.7% |
| 1964 | -0.9058 current US$ per square kilometre | -534.3% |
| 1965 | 0.0864 current US$ per square kilometre | -109.5% |
| 1966 | 0.003 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.6% |
| 1967 | 0.6913 current US$ per square kilometre | +23100.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0447 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0268 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1970 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +10522.2% |
| 1971 | -0.0715 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.5% |
| 1972 | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -3187.5% |
| 1973 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1974 | -0.2801 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.8% |
| 1975 | 0.6943 current US$ per square kilometre | -347.9% |
| 1976 | -0.5721 current US$ per square kilometre | -182.4% |
| 1977 | 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -1197.4% |
| 1978 | -0.1311 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.1% |
| 1979 | -0.3456 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.6% |
| 1980 | -0.5453 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.8% |
| 1981 | -0.8164 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 1982 | -0.6704 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1983 | -0.0656 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.2% |
| 1984 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -5068.2% |
| 1985 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.7% |
| 1986 | 10.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.4% |
| 1987 | 15.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1988 | 18.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1989 | 23.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1990 | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.5% |
| 1991 | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.9% |
| 1992 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.3% |
| 1993 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.5% |
| 1994 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1995 | 0.3165 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.3% |
| 1996 | -0.6091 current US$ per square kilometre | -292.5% |
| 1997 | -0.7972 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1998 | -2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +259.9% |
| 1999 | -3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2000 | -4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2001 | -2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.0% |
| 2002 | -5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.8% |
| 2003 | -3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2004 | -23.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +505.4% |
| 2005 | 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -132.6% |
| 2006 | 1.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.9% |
| 2007 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2008 | 9.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +498.4% |
| 2009 | 8.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2010 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2011 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2012 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.3% |
| 2013 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.2% |
| 2014 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2015 | 5 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2016 | 6.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2017 | 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2018 | 7.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2019 | 6.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2020 | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2021 | 7.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2022 | 10.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2023 | 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.0255 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5721 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8164 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 27 Ethiopia 67.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Burundi 61.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Djibouti 60.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Hong Kong 47.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Ukraine 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Türkiye 43.41 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Mozambique 42.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per in South Asia was 7.55 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 23.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -23.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per?
- South Asia ranks 30th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), per rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 103.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.