Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
3.18 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 52.1%
Rank
41st
of 45 groups
All-time high
22.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0.5751 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific stood at 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 52.1% on the previous year and down 72.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 22.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.5751 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 41st of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.7874 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.9891 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 1963 | 0.5751 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1964 | 0.9079 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.9% |
| 1965 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1966 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1967 | 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1968 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1969 | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1970 | 2.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1971 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1972 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1973 | 3.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1974 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1975 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1976 | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1977 | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1978 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1979 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1980 | 5.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 1981 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 1982 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1983 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1984 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 1985 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 1986 | 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.1% |
| 1987 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1988 | 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.3% |
| 1989 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1990 | 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1991 | 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1992 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1993 | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.8% |
| 1994 | 6.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1995 | 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1996 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1997 | 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1999 | 6.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2001 | 5.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 2002 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2003 | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2004 | 8.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.5% |
| 2005 | 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2006 | 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2007 | 15.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2008 | 22.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
| 2009 | 15.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 2010 | 11.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 2011 | 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 2012 | 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2013 | 11.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2014 | 9.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2015 | 14 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.1% |
| 2016 | 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2017 | 12.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2018 | 13.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2019 | 15.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2020 | 14.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2021 | 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2022 | 6.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.8% |
| 2023 | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5751 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 38 Sri Lanka 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Nigeria 136.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Comoros 124.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Hong Kong, China 114.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Pakistan 109.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 South Sudan 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Kenya 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in East Asia & Pacific was 3.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 22.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5751 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 41st out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 72.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.