Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
36.89 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 10.9%
Rank
39th
of 45 groups
All-time high
63.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean recorded 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2023.
The figure is down 10.9% on the previous year and down 21.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 63.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 39th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0568 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.2217 current US$ per square kilometre | +290.4% |
| 1965 | 0.142 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.0% |
| 1966 | 0.2994 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.9% |
| 1967 | 0.1858 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.9% |
| 1968 | 0.2565 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1969 | 0.1275 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.3% |
| 1970 | 0.4593 current US$ per square kilometre | +260.2% |
| 1971 | 0.6919 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.7% |
| 1972 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.8% |
| 1973 | 0.794 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1974 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1975 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1976 | 0.6889 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.4% |
| 1977 | 0.9305 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1978 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.1% |
| 1979 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1980 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.8% |
| 1981 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1982 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1983 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1984 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.3% |
| 1985 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1986 | 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 1987 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 1988 | 11.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.1% |
| 1989 | 12.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1990 | 12.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1991 | 12.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1992 | 14.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 1993 | 16.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1994 | 20.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1995 | 29.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 1996 | 31.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1997 | 25.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1998 | 30.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1999 | 25.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 2000 | 16.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.4% |
| 2001 | 27.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 2002 | 15.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 2003 | 23.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.2% |
| 2004 | 28.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2005 | 30.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2006 | 38.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.9% |
| 2007 | 49.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2008 | 52.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2009 | 54.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2010 | 62.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2011 | 62.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 59.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2013 | 47.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2014 | 32.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 2015 | 52.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.3% |
| 2016 | 54.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2017 | 38.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2018 | 60.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 2019 | 36.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2020 | 63.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 2021 | 47.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2022 | 41.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2023 | 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1433 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2994 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4593 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 21.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 33.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 50.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 47.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 63.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Latvia 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Latin America & Caribbean was 36.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 63.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 39th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.